Advanced Fire Control Technologies, Inc.   

                "Reducing Risk and Saving Lives & Property"

Military Performance Comparison

Criteria                                                    Phoenixâ MKâ Series           

Fire suppression capability¹                               ≥                     

Acquisition Cost                                             50%                     

Manpower Req'd²                                              1                     

Annual Maintenance Cost EST.                         $300                    

Air Transportable                                            YES                       

• Apparatus Volume (cubic ft)                   37.3% Less               
• operational weight                                46.3% Less             
• Length                                                11.0% Less                
• Operational Area Capability                       98%                      

References:

1.  Fire suppression capability

• Tyndall ARFF Research DRAFT Executive Summary
• Analysis of Tyndall ARFF Research Testing for FAA based on AFCT video's
• Spreadsheet analysis of each Tyndall test as recorded by AFCT video
• FAA's Final report (NOTE:  FAA Technical scrapped Tydnall ARFF Research Laboratory report - reason unknown.  The FAA then wrote their own based on poor raw video footage provided by ARFF Research Laboratory.  Neither writer was in attendance for the bulk of the testing.  A contested third draft was finally published in 2007.)
• UHP P-19 Testing vs. STD P-19

2.  Manpower Requirements

• Eglin Air Force Base Testing Report

Graphical Comparisons:

• Trimax^TM, FireCombat^TM & Rino^TM bumper turret all w/HydroChem^TM technology vs. Phoenix^TM Pulse Delivery^TM & QuadAgent^TM Technology, ULTRA-HighPressure systems